Original articleClinical endoscopyA simplified regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation of Barrett's mucosa: a randomized multicenter trial comparing two ablation regimens
Review articleOpen access
Abstract:

BackgroundThe currently recommended regimen for focal radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of Barrett's esophagus (BE) comprises 2 applications of energy, cleaning of the device and ablation zone, and 2 additional applications of energy. A simplified regimen may be of clinical utility if it is faster, easier, and equally safe and effective.ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy of 2 focal RFA regimens.SettingThree tertiary referral centers.PatientsConsecutive patients scheduled for focal RFA of BE with flat type BE with at least 2 BE islands or mosaic groups of islands were enrolled.InterventionsBE areas were paired: 1 area was randomized to the “standard” regimen (2 × 15 J/cm2–clean–2 × 15 J/cm2) or to the “simplified” regimen (3 × 15 J/cm2–no clean), allocating the second area automatically to the other regimen. The percentage of surface area regression of each area was scored at 2 months by the endoscopist (blinded).Outcome MeasureProportion of completely removed BE areas at 2 months. Calculated sample size was 46 pairs of BE areas using a noninferiority design. Noninferiority was defined as <20% difference in the paired proportions.ResultsForty-five equivalent pairs of BE areas were included in 41 patients. The proportion of completely removed BE areas at 2 months after focal RFA was 30 (67%) for standard and 33 (73%) for simplified. Noninferiority was demonstrated by a 7% difference (95% CI, −10.6 to +20.9).LimitationsTertiary referral centers.ConclusionsThe results of this multicenter randomized trial suggest that a simplified 3 × 15 J/cm2 focal ablation regimen is not inferior to the standard regimen, regarding the endoscopic removal of residual Barrett islands.

Request full text

References (0)

Cited By (0)

No reference data.
No citation data.
Advertisement
Join Copernicus Academic and get access to over 12 million papers authored by 7+ million academics.
Join for free!